<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1988 Countdown #72: Kenny Loggins, &#8220;Nobody&#8217;s Fool&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/</link>
	<description>The Self-Aggrandizing Website of Gavin Edwards</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CHART ATTACK!: 9/24/88 &#124; Popdose</title>
		<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>CHART ATTACK!: 9/24/88 &#124; Popdose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Nobody&#8217;s Fool&#8221; was Loggins&#8217; final appearance not only in the Top 10, but in the Top 40. That might be another reason why the song isn&#8217;t included. It&#8217;s actually a shame, because the chorus is pretty damn good. You can read more about the song and its video at Gavin Edwards&#8217; Rule 42 blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Nobody&#8217;s Fool&#8221; was Loggins&#8217; final appearance not only in the Top 10, but in the Top 40. That might be another reason why the song isn&#8217;t included. It&#8217;s actually a shame, because the chorus is pretty damn good. You can read more about the song and its video at Gavin Edwards&#8217; Rule 42 blog. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-633</guid>
		<description>There's a whole category of "why do we have to make a high-concept video" videos, which also includes the extended version of "Owner of a Lonely Heart."

You would be astonished (or maybe you wouldn't) to know how often I quote from the dialogue in the "Oh Sherrie" video. "The label loves ya, Steve!"

I was friendly with a publicist who had worked with Journey back in the day. "I knew Sherrie," he confided. "Sherrie was a bitch."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a whole category of &#8220;why do we have to make a high-concept video&#8221; videos, which also includes the extended version of &#8220;Owner of a Lonely Heart.&#8221;</p>
<p>You would be astonished (or maybe you wouldn&#8217;t) to know how often I quote from the dialogue in the &#8220;Oh Sherrie&#8221; video. &#8220;The label loves ya, Steve!&#8221;</p>
<p>I was friendly with a publicist who had worked with Journey back in the day. &#8220;I knew Sherrie,&#8221; he confided. &#8220;Sherrie was a bitch.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nawrocki</title>
		<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nawrocki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-632</guid>
		<description>One of Kenny's biggest early hits, don't forget, was "I'm Alright," from what everyone now refers to as &lt;i&gt;Caddyshack I&lt;/i&gt;. That lends this pathetic attempt a little extra poignance. 

And God knows, I don't want to link to it, but Steve Perry's 1984 video for "Oh Sherrie" deserves some props in the meta department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Kenny&#8217;s biggest early hits, don&#8217;t forget, was &#8220;I&#8217;m Alright,&#8221; from what everyone now refers to as <i>Caddyshack I</i>. That lends this pathetic attempt a little extra poignance. </p>
<p>And God knows, I don&#8217;t want to link to it, but Steve Perry&#8217;s 1984 video for &#8220;Oh Sherrie&#8221; deserves some props in the meta department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M.</title>
		<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rulefortytwo.com/2009/02/05/1988-countdown-72-kenny-loggins-nobodys-fool/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>This is an all-around excellent post.

&lt;i&gt;Somewhere, former partner Jim Messina was gnashing his teeth and saying “Why not me?”&lt;/i&gt;

This is, basically, half the plot of this &lt;i&gt;Yacht Rock&lt;/i&gt; episode:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMTI8vg7A5U

&lt;i&gt;It’s hard to pinpoint, but I think 1988 is the year that videos started including this sort of self-referential “how the video was made” footage. There had been backstage camera crews before, and parodies of other MTV clips, but I don’t remember seeing gaffers and teamsters on-screen before 1988, when suddenly including them was deemed “post-modern” and hence cool.&lt;/i&gt;

You may be right about it being omnipresent in ’88, but the trend definitely predates that year. In fact, I think we have to give the credit for the meta-trend to just one man: &lt;b&gt;Phil Collins&lt;/b&gt;.

As seen here (1985):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9xY_cPenSs

And here (also 1985 -- no gaffers or boom mikes, but it's all about deconstructing video plots/genres):
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xev41_phil-collins-dont-lose-my-number

And &lt;i&gt;especially&lt;/i&gt; here (1986):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgnwnjviNho

The difference between these three seminal Collins clips and what you're seeing in all the ’88 videos is the subsuming of the meta-trend into the &lt;i&gt;look&lt;/i&gt; of the videos, the background. "Sweet Child 'O' Mine" and "Nobody's Fool" aren't &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt; the making of the video the way "Invisible Touch" is -- the scenes of video-making are image-makers, just one more brick in the star-defining wall. (These images say: &lt;i&gt;I'm such a rock star, people build whole film shoots around me -- while models watch me read a magazine.&lt;/i&gt;) It's &lt;i&gt;MTV Cribs&lt;/i&gt; about 15–20 years early.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an all-around excellent post.</p>
<p><i>Somewhere, former partner Jim Messina was gnashing his teeth and saying “Why not me?”</i></p>
<p>This is, basically, half the plot of this <i>Yacht Rock</i> episode:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMTI8vg7A5U" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMTI8vg7A5U</a></p>
<p><i>It’s hard to pinpoint, but I think 1988 is the year that videos started including this sort of self-referential “how the video was made” footage. There had been backstage camera crews before, and parodies of other MTV clips, but I don’t remember seeing gaffers and teamsters on-screen before 1988, when suddenly including them was deemed “post-modern” and hence cool.</i></p>
<p>You may be right about it being omnipresent in ’88, but the trend definitely predates that year. In fact, I think we have to give the credit for the meta-trend to just one man: <b>Phil Collins</b>.</p>
<p>As seen here (1985):<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9xY_cPenSs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9xY_cPenSs</a></p>
<p>And here (also 1985 &#8212; no gaffers or boom mikes, but it&#8217;s all about deconstructing video plots/genres):<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xev41_phil-collins-dont-lose-my-number" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xev41_phil-collins-dont-lose-my-number</a></p>
<p>And <i>especially</i> here (1986):<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgnwnjviNho" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgnwnjviNho</a></p>
<p>The difference between these three seminal Collins clips and what you&#8217;re seeing in all the ’88 videos is the subsuming of the meta-trend into the <i>look</i> of the videos, the background. &#8220;Sweet Child &#8216;O&#8217; Mine&#8221; and &#8220;Nobody&#8217;s Fool&#8221; aren&#8217;t <i>about</i> the making of the video the way &#8220;Invisible Touch&#8221; is &#8212; the scenes of video-making are image-makers, just one more brick in the star-defining wall. (These images say: <i>I&#8217;m such a rock star, people build whole film shoots around me &#8212; while models watch me read a magazine.</i>) It&#8217;s <i>MTV Cribs</i> about 15–20 years early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
