<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1988 Countdown: Commercial Break #1</title>
	<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2008/05/15/1988-countdown-commercial-break-1/</link>
	<description>The Self-Aggrandizing Website of Gavin Edwards</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gavin</title>
		<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2008/05/15/1988-countdown-commercial-break-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rulefortytwo.com/2008/05/15/1988-countdown-commercial-break-1/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>So was the progression

punk
new wave
college rock
modern rock
alternative 
indie

?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So was the progression</p>
<p>punk<br />
new wave<br />
college rock<br />
modern rock<br />
alternative<br />
indie</p>
<p>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris M.</title>
		<link>http://rulefortytwo.com/2008/05/15/1988-countdown-commercial-break-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rulefortytwo.com/2008/05/15/1988-countdown-commercial-break-1/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>FWIW, 1988 was the year Billboard launched its Modern Rock chart. That name alone was something of a neologism -- as late as '87 or so my high-school friends and I were calling music of this Euroweenie/postpunk ilk "new wave" (don't laugh). But you are right that it was still too early for "alternative," hence Billboard (more likely, the industry/radio folk they survey/service) had to make up a term, hence "modern rock."

Anyway, the reason I bring this up: the first No. 1 song on the chart when it launched in '88 was none other than "Peek-a-Boo" by Siouxsie. That song also scraped the midsection of the big pop chart, the Hot 100. Prior to this, I'm pretty sure no Siouxsie songs -- not even the Top 20 club hit "Cities in Dust" ('85) -- had ever graced a Billboard chart.

So, to defend MTV in '88, S+Bs *were* "new" to the overwhelming majority of their audience and perceived as newbies on the radio. If I were programming/promoting MTV in '88, I'd have pushed Siouxsie as a hot new act, too, if only to help them along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, 1988 was the year Billboard launched its Modern Rock chart. That name alone was something of a neologism &#8212; as late as &#8216;87 or so my high-school friends and I were calling music of this Euroweenie/postpunk ilk &#8220;new wave&#8221; (don&#8217;t laugh). But you are right that it was still too early for &#8220;alternative,&#8221; hence Billboard (more likely, the industry/radio folk they survey/service) had to make up a term, hence &#8220;modern rock.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway, the reason I bring this up: the first No. 1 song on the chart when it launched in &#8216;88 was none other than &#8220;Peek-a-Boo&#8221; by Siouxsie. That song also scraped the midsection of the big pop chart, the Hot 100. Prior to this, I&#8217;m pretty sure no Siouxsie songs &#8212; not even the Top 20 club hit &#8220;Cities in Dust&#8221; (&#8217;85) &#8212; had ever graced a Billboard chart.</p>
<p>So, to defend MTV in &#8216;88, S+Bs *were* &#8220;new&#8221; to the overwhelming majority of their audience and perceived as newbies on the radio. If I were programming/promoting MTV in &#8216;88, I&#8217;d have pushed Siouxsie as a hot new act, too, if only to help them along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
